R+F FilterElements logo
Back to Blog
Standards & Performance31 October 20266 read

Why "Pore Size" Is the Wrong Way to Rate a Coalescing Filter Element

Many datasheets quote a "pore size" in microns. For a depth-loading coalescing element made of borosilicate glass microfibre that number is almost meaningless. Here is why — and what to compare instead.

Share this page WhatsApp LinkedIn E-mail
RF-C coalescing filter element made of borosilicate glass microfibre

Summary

Borosilicate glass microfibre elements are depth filters made of randomly laid fibre layers. Particles and aerosols are captured when they collide with a fibre and are held by intermolecular (Van der Waals) forces, so the size or shape of the spaces between fibres is not significant. Compare elements by stated efficiency at a defined particle size: all R+F microfibre grades are rated at 0.01 µm, from 90 % (PF) to 99.99998 % (AX).

"What is the pore size of this element?" is one of the most common questions we receive. It sounds sensible — a sieve with smaller holes stops smaller particles. But a coalescing element made of borosilicate glass microfibre is not a sieve. It is a depth filter, and for a depth filter a "pore size" tells you very little about what actually reaches your process.

A depth filter has no defined pores

Glass microfibre media are built from many in-depth layers of fibres laid down in a random fashion. There is no regular mesh and no single opening size. The gaps between fibres vary from place to place and are, in many places, far larger than the particles the element removes. If the element worked by sieving alone, fine aerosols would simply pass through.

Instead, a particle is captured when it collides with a fibre. Once it touches the fibre it is held there by intermolecular forces — the Van der Waals forces. These forces are essentially independent of what the particle is made of and of external conditions such as relative humidity or temperature. The element is designed to maximise the chance of that collision along the full depth of the media.

Key insight: Because capture depends on collisions with fibres, not on the size of the spaces between them, it is not meaningful to characterise a microfibre element by "pore size". What matters is the tested efficiency at a defined particle size.
A depth filter has no defined pores
Glass microfibre media are built from many in-depth layers of fibres laid down in a random fashion.

How particles actually reach the fibre

Four mechanisms bring particles into contact with the fibres, each dominant in a different size range: gravitational settling for large droplets, inertial impaction above about 1 µm, direct interception between roughly 0.3 and 1 µm, and diffusion (Brownian motion) below 0.3 µm. We explain them in detail in our article on the four capture mechanisms. Together they allow borosilicate glass microfibre to remove aerosols from above 50 µm down to below 0.01 µm.

> 50 µm
Upper end of capture range
< 0.01 µm
Lower end of capture range
≈ 0.3 µm
Most penetrating particle size
0
Liquid absorbed by the media

What to compare instead of pore size

A meaningful comparison needs three pieces of information: the efficiency in percent, the particle size it refers to, and the test method. A percentage without a particle size is as incomplete as a pore size. R+F states the efficiency of every borosilicate microfibre grade at 0.01 µm, so the grades can be compared directly:

GradeEfficiencyTypical use
AX99.99998 % @ 0.01 µmUltra-fine final stage
UX99.9999 % @ 0.01 µmHigh-purity final stage
HE99.99 % @ 0.01 µmStandard final coalescing
ME99.5 % @ 0.01 µmIntermediate stage
ST95 % @ 0.01 µmPre-coalescing, long life
PF90 % @ 0.01 µmPre-filtration, lowest Δp

The grade is selected by position in the system: ST or PF as a pre-coalescer to take the bulk of the aerosol load at low differential pressure, HE as the standard final coalescer — for example RF-C-51230-HE — and UX or AX where downstream equipment needs the highest purity. Particulate elements such as RF-P-51230-HE follow the same principle for dry particles.

⚠ Watch out: A "1 µm" or "0.1 µm" label on a competing element may be a nominal pore size, an absolute rating from a liquid test, or an efficiency at a different particle size. Ask which one it is before comparing — our solution page on misleading micron ratings lists the questions to ask.

"

Need help selecting the right element grade?

Size Your Filter Online

Use our free Engineering Tool to get a filtration recommendation for your specific application in under 2 minutes.

Open Sizing Tool

Why the test particle size matters

Standard test methods for high-efficiency filters, such as the DOP test and the sodium flame test, deliberately challenge filters with particles in the 0.3 to 0.6 µm range. This is close to the most penetrating particle size, where neither impaction and interception nor diffusion is fully effective. Read more in MPPS — why 0.3 µm is the hardest size to filter.

Key Takeaway
  • collides with a fibre
  • Four mechanisms bring particles into contact with the fibres, each dominant in a different size range: gravitational settling for large droplets, inertial impaction above about 1 µm, direct interception between roughly 0.
  • efficiency in percent
  • Standard test methods for high-efficiency filters, such as the DOP test and the sodium flame test, deliberately challenge filters with particles in the 0.

Practical checklist

  • Ask for efficiency and particle size, never one without the other.
  • Check whether a micron figure is a pore size, an absolute liquid rating or a gas efficiency.
  • Compare clean differential pressure at your actual flow, not just the efficiency.
  • Choose the grade by position: pre-coalescer, final coalescer or high-purity stage.
  • Download our Technical Note "Why borosilicate glass microfibre?" (PDF) or browse all datasheets in the R+F download library.
Need help selecting the right element grade?
Try our Engineering Sizing Tool → or send us your operating data — we reply with a concrete R+F configuration.

Related reading

Need help selecting the right filter?

Our technical team can review your application requirements and recommend the optimal filtration solution.

Related articles